Just to expound on this thought a little bit, as I find the equipment part of the game interesting (full disclosure, I don’t often actually buy new clubs… I’m playing 2012 Adams CMBs and was playing a Cobra Pro LTD driver until Jon sent me a new Mavrik [Thanks Jon!])
I don’t think there are a ton of gains left for modern technology… I think we’ve hit peak equipment in terms of ball speeds and performance… Companies can make trade offs, and find some small wins in the world of drivers, but they are incremental and pretty small. PING allegedly only releases new clubs when they are better than the old clubs, so I’m curious to see whats in the replacement for the 425…
I also don’t think many people have optimized their driver setup for their own swing, or their own potential. I think this is the remaining “blue space” for companies to get into, and I also think it’s why we’ve seen a recent transition into “real deal” shafts vs made for shafts.
One of my goals on the simulator this season is to see where my numbers are, and what my potential is… my club head speed was 115 before a back injury, and I was trying to get it to 120… I need 300+ yards of carry (I’m less concerned with total distance) to basically change a par 5 I hate on my home course into a long par 5 that I hate… it’s going to come down to improving my overall swing speed, but also optimizing my launch parameters.
I don’t think it requires the newest driver to achieve this goal… but whenever I’m back to swinging full speed, I’ll put my old drivers to the test vs the newest driver…
I think the equipment gains the average golfer will see in new equipment lies in getting fit and having a proper club built for their swing. Finding that right fit is the challenge (and the fun!). I also think there are trade offs in any setup… forgiveness vs total distance, maximizing carry over potential distance, minimizing big misses…