As part of a school project, I’ve been working on a program that calculates optimal golf strategy given an arbitrary shot pattern(s). While testing with my shot patterns (ie really big), it usually doesn’t suggest anything too surprising - it loves hitting the big stick, swears by the center of the green, and strongly favours in play over in the fairway. However, one tee-shot suggestion on a straight, tree-lined par 4 caught me completely off-guard. The computer wants to aim at the LHS trees and use the adjacent fairway to capture leftward shots.
Before going any further I’ll note that (at least on this hole) this strategy only applies for wide dispersion patterns. Using a typical scratch driver dispersion around 70-75 yards wide, the computer likes the predictable strategy of aiming at the center of the fairway.
To start, below is an adjusted image of the hole. Light green is fairway, dark green is rough, tan is trees, blue is water.
Aiming down the middle of the fairway, the computer thinks I will hit the fairway 34% of the time, and be in the trees 31% of the time. The shot pattern is shown below (note the red star indicating the center of the shot pattern):
Aiming at the left hand side trees, the computer thinks I will hit the fairway 32.2% of the time, but be in the trees only 21.3% of the time (as well as one big outlier into the water). Average proximity to the hole is less than 2 yards farther. The key seems to be that this eliminates all but the most rightward shots going into the right hand side trees. Essentially, by aiming at the left hand trees, my shot pattern only has to contest with one set of trees. The shot pattern is shown below:
Overall, it says this aimline is about 0.05 shots better than aiming at the center of the fairway. Moreover, this gap would be even greater if I counted the adjacent fairway as a fairway hit which knowing this hole, it may as well be.
I think a big takeaway for people who spray the ball like me (and even straighter hitters) is that it can be okay to aim at trouble. Unless the trouble encompasses a large area, you’re probably not going to hit it in the hazard. A classic example is a modest sized bunker in the middle of the fairway. For erratic players like myself we are usually best off taking dead aim at the bunker. We’d be lucky (or unlucky) to put 10% of our shots into said bunker.
I know a lot of you will find this overly technical but I personally find this stuff fascinating.